[wellylug] Need some help with Gentoo
Ewen McNeill
ewen at naos.co.nz
Mon Jun 2 17:02:41 NZST 2003
In message <20030602045431.7557DAE2A0 at basilica.la.naos.co.nz>, Ewen McNeill writes:
>In message <1054527327.670.2.camel at Planet_Irk>, Jamie Dobbs writes:
>>>[Mounted VFAT permissions "wrong"]
>>
>>I fully understand your explanation but I honestly can't see how that
>>works. The same thing would work find under Mandrake and RadHat with no
>>problems so why won't it work with Gentoo? [....]
>[...]
>If there's more than one user that should manipulate them the "best"
>approach would be to stick all those users in a group, and mount the
>VFAT file systems gid=THATGROUP, and umask=0770 or umask=0775.
>[....]
>If you just don't care that everyone can write to the files, mount the
>filesystem with umask=0777 and be done with it.
That'll have to be umask=007 or umask=002 actually (and umask=000 for the
last one). All these umasks are backwards from what I would "obviously"
expect (ie, violate the principle of least surprise), and I didn't stop
long enough to remember that before posting. Whoops.
>>If this is an example of the 'quality' of Gentoo then I fear that they
>>are wasting their time!
One final comment about this. One of the nice things about Unix/Linux
is that generally there is a sensible, not-too-hard-to-find-out
explanation for why things are different on two systems. Which means
once you figure it out, you can make the "wrong" system like the "right"
one. This is a pleasant contrast to some OS I've dealt with where
"why is it different" is not infrequently answered "nobody knows", and
"how do I get it like that" is not infrequently answered with "have you
tried reinstalling".
Ewen
More information about the wellylug
mailing list