[wellylug] [Fwd: Govt guidance would guarantee our geek credentials (Green Party media release)]
jumbophut
jumbophut at gmail.com
Sun Jul 11 17:38:05 NZST 2004
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:56:28 +1200, Damon Lynch wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 11:26, Ian Beardslee wrote:
>
> > Of course who in their right mind sends HTML email anyway? Before anyone
> > leaps - and those that use Outlook Express can't really be considered in
> > their right mind :-)
>
> New Scientist does. UN News does. Human Rights Network does. Oxfam as
> well. Lots of organisations do. Newsletters can be a lot easier to
> read when they're appropriately formatted.
>
So send a link to a web page!
There are number of good reasons not to send HTML e-mail:
1) It increases traffic because of all the tags (no big deal if you
only have a few, but it makes a difference to ISPs)
2) It increases the likelihood of exploits because there is a lot of
code required to handle the formatting, and because some features
(e.g. javascript, ActiveX) are inherently dangerous.
3) People still use e-mail clients which don't support HMTL (one
imagines that people who have need of UN/HRN/Oxfam services fall into
this camp).
4) It's the number 1 sign that an e-mail is spam, and greatly
increases the likelihood that a Bayesian filter will send it to
oblivion.
In short, just because other people do it, doesn't mean you should.
Sorry, way off-topic, but it's a pet peeve.
Tony
More information about the wellylug
mailing list