[wellylug] Forking Linux.
Pete Black
pete at marchingcubes.com
Wed Nov 10 16:14:17 NZDT 2004
Technically, yes, it is incorrect. Linux - as a trademark held by Linus
Torvalds and as a project - refers strictly to the kernel.
GNU/Linux is a term proposed by Richard Stallman and the FSF to refer to
the collection of GNU libc/GNU userland applications and gcc compiler
running on a Linux kernel.
None of these terms really offer a comprehensive overview of the
contributions of various parties to an average Linux distro, or an
Operating System bundle that contains a significant proportion of open
source products.
The term 'Linux' has come to mean the bundle of software shipped in
addition to the Linux sofware, and I agree the recusive nature of the
GNU acronym does indeed raise some semantic confusion when it is
bundled with a 'true' UNIX kernel.
However, one thing is certainly true - If the product does not contain a
Linux kernel, then it isn't a Linux.
-Pete
> Pete Black wrote:
>
>> Linux is an OS kernel. Simple as that.
>
>
> So the common use of 'Linux' referring to a distribution containing
> the kernel and all the other software is invalid? If so, what is the
> correct term? How do we get the masses to use that correct term? And
> if the wrong term is so widely used, has it now changed from wrong to
> right?
>
>>
>> Solaris with X.org/GNOME etc. might as well be called GNU/Solaris, in
>> the same way as a more strictly 'correct' term for what we know as
>> 'Linux' would be GNU/Linux.
>
>
> If GNU is 'GNUs Not Unix' and Solaris is Unix then how can we have
> GNU/Solaris? Now my brain is going to explode.
>
>
More information about the wellylug
mailing list