[wellylug] how slow

Stig Telfer wellylug at lizardlogic.co.uk
Thu Mar 17 11:58:15 NZDT 2005


On 16 Mar 2005, at 20:59, E.Chalaron wrote:

>> The question is, what are you doing?
> Ok you wanted it :-)
> [SPAM]
> Converting 8/Super8 mm/16 mm movies. I shoot each movie frame one at a 
> time,
> knowing that each small Kodak reel is about 3600 frames, each of them 
> at
> 1400*1100 pixels in 4:2:2 it makes about 4.5 Mb *3600 for a 3.ish 
> minute
> movie to denoise, scale down + other stuff to get a DV file.
> some clips here :
> http://calenduro.free.fr/DEMO
>
> So it is more than email ! :-)
>
> I think mjpegtools is now available for 64 bits.
> Will see... before ordering :-)
>
> Thanks a lot
> E

Did I see you in a newspaper article about a month ago?

A 64-bit architecture appears to be of little benefit to your 
application as you're working with bit-manipulation and byte 
quantities.  As somebody else said, this is altivec (or similar) 
territory.  A 64-bit platform will help for incidental reasons, for 
example they are specified with larger caches and good memory 
performance.

I think that since the image data is too bulky to cache well, high 
memory bandwidth is the main factor you should be looking for.

Regards,
Stig Telfer




More information about the wellylug mailing list