[wlug_org] Individual liability from not being incorporated.
Jamie Baddeley
wlug_org@lists.naos.co.nz
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:11:21 +1200
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 12:57, Tony Wills wrote:
Basically that incorporation offers limited protection to the group as a
whole, and better protection to those tasked with organising it (as long
as they stay within agreed rules).
> At 08:49 10/08/04 +1200, Carl wrote:
a number points and counterpoints, but basically felt that the risk of
being exposed and therefore needing protection was basically low (at
this stage)
summary: Incorporation is often limited use right now, but that's not to
say that it might be in the future when the organising team is faced
with more complex decisions?
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 12:57, Tony Wills wrote:
> Anyway how on earth can you sue all members of a group when the group
> doesn't even have a definition of who its members are?? :p
Maybe this is our first task?
jamie