[wlug_org] $$$ to spend etc (was Individual liability from notbeing incorporated)

[Michael Dittmer]

I'll second it Jamie

Hereby seconded!!!

Now can we move on??? 

-----Original Message-----
From: wlug_org-admin@lists.naos.co.nz
[mailto:wlug_org-admin@lists.naos.co.nz] On Behalf Of Jamie Baddeley
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 7:24 PM
To: wlug_org@lists.naos.co.nz
Subject: Re: [wlug_org] $$$ to spend etc (was Individual liability from
notbeing incorporated)

On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 19:07, Wood Brent wrote:

> > On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 16:33, Jethro Carr wrote:
> > 1) We could you the electronic voting to do a 'pre' vote, which gets the
> > public opinion to the org list. 
> > 

> I hereby suggest that:
> 
> The org list members [and cabal] agree that the final say regarding any
LUG
> issue will be a meeting based vote of the members.
> 
> The means of ensuring the members are best informed and involved in the
> discussions and decision making process(es) prior to the actual vote will
be by
> concensus of the org list (which anyone can join!)
> 
> Can we have agreement on this? 
> 
> 
> If so, we can tick it off & get onto the next step: ie, what is a member?
:-)
> 

I support Brents suggestions completely with the addition of a more
managed (i.e org_team agrees on the contents of the poll prior to) use
of the poll/voting system (complete with web based user authentication)
as a form of "market research" to assist us in determining the views of
the LUG prior to an real_issue vote. This information is the input of
those who for what ever reason are not motivated to join the org_list,
BUT do have an opinion.

I move we adopt Brent's suggestion, plus Jethro's suggestion number 1.

who'll second me?

jamie	
(I also think the wellylug.inc issue can be comfortably deferred)


-- 
WellyLUG Organising Group Mailing List: wlug_org@lists.naos.co.nz
To Leave:  http://lists.naos.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/wlug_org