[wlug_org] $$$ to spend etc (was Individual liability from not
being incorporated)
Jethro Carr
wlug_org@lists.naos.co.nz
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:00:11 +1200
I also 2nd you.
Sounds good. Everyone else agree?
(me glares threatningly around the room with a baseball bat) ;-)
On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 19:23, Jamie Baddeley wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 19:07, Wood Brent wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 16:33, Jethro Carr wrote:
> > > 1) We could you the electronic voting to do a 'pre' vote, which gets the
> > > public opinion to the org list.
> > >
>
> > I hereby suggest that:
> >
> > The org list members [and cabal] agree that the final say regarding any LUG
> > issue will be a meeting based vote of the members.
> >
> > The means of ensuring the members are best informed and involved in the
> > discussions and decision making process(es) prior to the actual vote will be by
> > concensus of the org list (which anyone can join!)
> >
> > Can we have agreement on this?
> >
> >
> > If so, we can tick it off & get onto the next step: ie, what is a member? :-)
> >
>
> I support Brents suggestions completely with the addition of a more
> managed (i.e org_team agrees on the contents of the poll prior to) use
> of the poll/voting system (complete with web based user authentication)
> as a form of "market research" to assist us in determining the views of
> the LUG prior to an real_issue vote. This information is the input of
> those who for what ever reason are not motivated to join the org_list,
> BUT do have an opinion.
>
> I move we adopt Brent's suggestion, plus Jethro's suggestion number 1.
>
> who'll second me?
>
> jamie
> (I also think the wellylug.inc issue can be comfortably deferred)
--
-- Jethro
dodocaptain@paradise.net.nz
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/jethroc
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/jethroc/cv.html
http://www.wellylug.org.nz