[wlug_org] Rule suggestions (proposal)

[Jethro Carr]

--=-oA+UvhHXwgv/Vw+Apr0M
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 20:44 -0700, Brent Wood wrote:
> I therefore propose the following for concensus approval of the org list.
> Please comment on wording, to refine the proposal for submitting to the m=
ain
> list & meeting. I also suggest that as this is very much list related, th=
at a
> meeting vote is not appropriate to approve the proposal, instead a vote i=
s
> taken on the Wellylug web site (if this is OK with Jethro etc).

sure, a while ago I built a system into the site, which allows anyone
with a user account to vote.

However, like anything on the internet it could be abused by people
double-registering. That said, I do track registrations, so anyone who
registers will be noticed by me. So I'd rate it as a 'Fairly reliable
voting system.




> New (& old) members are not sure what the preferred netiquette or LUG
> guidelines are. Some members have suggested or assumed their own preferen=
ces
> constitute LUG guidelines, and have suggested others should follow them. =
To
> avoid having such preferences be treated as guidelines, the web site shou=
ld
> clearly state what the rules & guidelines are (which I believe it does no=
w) and
> members should be made (& ideally kept) aware of this.=20
>=20
> (on this topic, it may be better to have these under a LUG "guidelines" e=
ntry
> instead of "discussions - not that easy to find as they are - Jethro?)

okay, I'll see how I can better position them.


> I know there may be an admin issue given the different memberships od teh=
 web
> site & lists, but there must be some way of implementing a suitable remin=
der
> msg- automated administrivia or something?

Currently, the mailing list automatically sends out the monthly email.
See Jeremy about that.



--=20
Jethro Carr <jethro.carr@jedolinux.com>

www.jethrocarr.jedolinux.com

www.jethrocarr.jedolinux.com/index.php?page=3Dcv/cv.php

--=-oA+UvhHXwgv/Vw+Apr0M
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBC/xQ3zaGhUDexX9wRArr9AJwITrPWp85nsTjok88p6SCuACYPQgCeKKws
SbUtqaEY/6iynX12kTSfrNw=
=7t4K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-oA+UvhHXwgv/Vw+Apr0M--