[wellylug] (no subject)
Sam Cannell
sam at plaz.net.nz
Wed Apr 14 17:28:33 NZST 2004
(to answer both your messages at once)
For me, the first example that came to mind is the thread starting with
http://lists.naos.co.nz/pipermail/wellylug/2004-February/005193.html
'Help!
I am trying to persuade a small organisation not to accept the following
proposed 'solution' to their file server needs:
"The server, with Microsoft Small Business Server 2003 - Premium
Edition...'
Etc etc.
-----Original Message-----
From: wellylug-admin at lists.naos.co.nz
[mailto:wellylug-admin at lists.naos.co.nz] On Behalf Of Damon Lynch
Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2004 5:00 p.m.
To: wellylug
Subject: RE: [wellylug] (no subject)
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 16:47, Jamie Dobbs wrote:
> > Don't get me wrong - if you want to set up an open source advocacy
> > group, then don't let me stop you. However if The People desire
this to
> > be the future of the Lug, then I want no part in it.
>
> This is my feeling also
>
Then please provide recent evidence or examples of where Wellylug
members have been:
1. coercing windows users into running GNU/Linux
2. "preaching" or "evangalising" in a manner that sets their
actions apart from what people normally do when they sincerely
state their opinions
And please state why you find it objectionable and what you believe they
could have done that would alleviate your concerns.
Thanks
Damon
--
Wellington Linux Users Group Mailing List: wellylug at lists.naos.co.nz
To Leave: http://lists.naos.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/wellylug
More information about the wellylug
mailing list