[wellylug] (no subject)

[Damon Lynch]

On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 17:28, Sam Cannell wrote:
> (to answer both your messages at once)
> 
> For me, the first example that came to mind is the thread starting with
> http://lists.naos.co.nz/pipermail/wellylug/2004-February/005193.html

Could you please be more specific?  That's a whole thread, and I am
having a hard time understanding the problem you are raising.  And since
you have raised it one more than one occasion, it would be useful to
clear it up once and for all.

Thanks
Damon
> 
> 'Help!
> 
> I am trying to persuade a small organisation not to accept the following
> 
> proposed 'solution' to their file server needs:
> 
> "The server, with Microsoft Small Business Server 2003 - Premium
> Edition...'
> 
> Etc etc.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wellylug-admin at lists.naos.co.nz
> [mailto:wellylug-admin at lists.naos.co.nz] On Behalf Of Damon Lynch
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2004 5:00 p.m.
> To: wellylug
> Subject: RE: [wellylug] (no subject)
> 
> On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 16:47, Jamie Dobbs wrote:
> > > Don't get me wrong - if you want to set up an open source advocacy
> > > group, then don't let me stop you.  However if The People desire
> this to
> > > be the future of the Lug, then I want no part in it.
> > 
> > This is my feeling also
> > 
> 
> Then please provide recent evidence or examples of where Wellylug
> members have been:
> 
>      1. coercing windows users into running GNU/Linux
>      2. "preaching" or "evangalising" in a manner that sets their
>         actions apart from what people normally do when they sincerely
>         state their opinions
> 
> And please state why you find it objectionable and what you believe they
> could have done that would alleviate your concerns.
> 
> Thanks
> Damon
> 
> 
> -- 
> Wellington Linux Users Group Mailing List: wellylug at lists.naos.co.nz
> To Leave:  http://lists.naos.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/wellylug
> 
>