OT: Re: [wellylug] Oh whoopee

[Jeremy Naylor]

At 22:46 17/04/2005, you wrote:

>The Commerce Commission's reply suggests they are focussing on the
>issues of anti-competitiveness or compliance with the
>Telecommunications Act, which is not surprising since the earlier
>letters I saw on this list seemed to focus on that sort of issue too.
>
>However, you may have a stronger case under the Fair Trading Act,
>assuming the TC contract didn't clearly indicate that 'international
>traffic' would be defined as 'anything not covered by a peering
>agreement with TC, even if that means traffic originating from and
>terminating at points within NZ'.  Try writing again, citing the way
>in which the Act has been breached.  Or you can go direct to a
>disputes tribunal.
>
>More here:
><http://www.consumeraffairs.govt.nz/consumerinfo/fta.html>
>
>--
>Tony (echo 'spend!,pocket awide' | sed 'y/acdeikospntw!, /l at omcgtjuba.phi/')

Hey Tony and all,

Paradise Net does say on their web site that local traffic goes via WIX & 
APE, and therefore it's free though. This statement is crap because TC 
doesn't peer at WIX & APE anymore of course.

Thanks,

Jeremy Naylor
p: +64 21 374 689
e: jeremy.naylor at r2.co.nz
w: http://www.r2.co.nz/~jeremy
w: http://e-living.wellington.net.nz 



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.14 - Release Date: 16/04/2005