[wellylug] Linux as selling point.

[Phillip Hutchings]

> Granted, but, as I have said, what if all you did was download a
> stock-standard copy of the source code from the developer of that  
> source
> code, and then compile it, and then embed the results into a  
> gadget, and
> sell copies of that gadget?

You've agreed to the GPL and must adhere to its requirements.

> Even better - what if you downloaded a binary from the developers
> website and embedded *that* binary into your gadget and sold copies of
> *that* gadget?

You've agreed to the GPL and must adhere to its requirements.

> In that case you've not even seen the original source code.

The GPL doesn't make a differentiation on what you've downloaded. You  
_MUST_ make the source available to anyone who has the executable.

> What is the difference between a manufacturer *using* Open Source
> software embedded within a hardware device to make its device work,  
> and,
> for example, RedHat taking somebody else's software, and  
> distributing it
> further for other persons to use as they wish?

None.

> I am, of course, discussing the usage or distribution of unmodified
> software.

The GPL makes no differentiation between modified and non-modified  
distribution. Only the distribution matters, and if you do sell  
anything with GPL software on in any form you must supply the source  
on request.

--
Phillip Hutchings
phillip.hutchings at sitharus.com


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2234 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.wellylug.org.nz/pipermail/wellylug/attachments/20050813/ff5d5335/attachment.bin