[wellylug] [OT] Internet & Citylink

Leo pizbit at neko.net.nz
Mon Feb 28 20:37:24 NZDT 2005

Hash: SHA1

Richard Hector wrote:
| On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 07:59:50PM +1300, Jamie Dobbs wrote:
|>David Antliff wrote:
|>>On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Cliff Pratt wrote:
|>>>The rule of thumb used to be to divide by 10. That was to allow for
|>>>the overhead of stop and start bits. I guess that only applies to
|>>>serial port lines. I also guess that it doesn't apply to ADSL, but
|>>>I'm not sure why. Anyone care to comment?
|>>Because on broadband services the overhead is transparent to the user?
|>>The advertised speed is customer payload rate, not connection speed or
|>>symbol rate or anything like that. So a 256kbps link is 256 * 1000 (a
|>>kilobit is 1000 bits, not 1024) which is 256000/8 = 32000 Bps or
|>1000 bits is NOT a kilobit (or at least wasn't when I went to either
|>University or Polytech, or in the 25 years I've been using computers).
|>The numeric base of computers is powers of 2, and you cannot get 1000
|>from a whole power of 2, the closest you can get is 1024 which is the
|>correct definition of kilo in computer terms.
| The data comms people have usually stuck to real prefixes rather than
| the weird ones computer people use.
| Adopting existing terms for the 1024 multiples was a silly thing to do,
| Richard
Just to clear things up: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


More information about the wellylug mailing list