[wellylug] Formalising WellyLUG - revisited

[Lindsay Hunter]

On the other hand, the formalisation thought useful by many will not 
affect those who don't want to be involved and cannot see the group 
getting any larger than it is now.  Unless you think it is going to 
impinge on your freedom of action, I would suggest you don't discourage 
the changes thought necessary by others.  Apply J. S. Mill's test, ie 
you can do anything as long as it does not impinge on others. 

Lindsay

Jamie Dobbs wrote:

>A reminder to people that there will be some discussion (possibly
>heated)on the formalisation of WellyLUG and the adoption of a proposed
>constitution etc. at the Feb. LUG meetings.
>
>It is vital that everyone who has an opinion on this makes it known by
>either attending the Feb. meeting or making it quite clear on the list
>what their feelings are on this proposed formalisation.
>
>My own personal feeling (which seem to be shared by a number of others)is
>that the current set-up of the LUG works well for most people and that
>there is no real need to change this. Formalisation, in my view, will just
>deter many people, who might otherwise want to, from becoming involved
>with the group.
>
>Remember that unless you have your say then you won't be able to complain
>about any decisions that are made about the future of _your_ LUG, so
>ensure you either attend the Feb. meeting or make your feelings known in a
>public forum where they can be seen by all involved.
>
>- Jamie -
>
>
>
>  
>

-- 
Lindsay Hunter
021 636 926
04.934 1702