[wellylug] Re: CA-CERT Assurance

[Sam Cannell]

Simon,

A couple of things:

* What's wrong with the signal/noise ratio?  In my opinion, it's been
great recently.  If by signal/noise you refer to the number of posts
solely related to Linux, then your initial CA-Cert post would also be
classed as noise, no?

* A lack of people replying to you praising your joke does not imply
that nobody understood it.

* Your latest email is feels extremely judgemental of everyone else on a
list that you appear to have posted a grand total of five messages to.

* Your first email was, in my opinion, very pushy and didn't explain any
real benefit in becoming a "CA-Cert User".

Just my thoughts.

Sam

On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 10:59, Simon Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Due to the lack of interest in free digital certificates (zero responses) 
> the CA-Cert Assurers will not attend WLUG meetings to performance 
> assurances.
> 
> The lack of interest is disappointing (almost as disappointing as no-one 
> getting my ":q!" joke!) but understandable. We'll try again in six months 
> or so, when the email signal/noise ratio is exponentially lower there 
> might be a greater need.
> 
> Regards,
> Simon.
-- 
Sam Cannell <sam at plaz.net.nz>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.wellylug.org.nz/pipermail/wellylug/attachments/20040604/6600b7da/attachment.pgp